Search for: "Bottom v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2014, 1:25 pm
Administrative Law Social Security Disability BOTTOM LINE: In denying claim for Social Security disability benefits, the Commissioner of Social Security properly considered claimant’s medial history and the combined effects of his multiple impairments, and the Commissioner’s decision was therefore affirmed. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
After all, Chevron v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am
Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am
See also pages 30-32 of the brief for former INS commissioners.) [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 5:59 am
By the close of the 19th century, it became apparent that a new system - one that was legally-based, economically-sound, and socially-acceptable - had to be developed. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
Social Security And Taxes Many senior citizens preparing for retirement may not realize that their Social Security income could be taxable under certain conditions. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:15 pm
Heritage employed 24 people, 16 of whom did not have social security numbers. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
At bottom, ruling in favor of Big Tech in NetChoice would effectively require the Supreme Court to disregard decades of First Amendment precedent and throw asunder legions of well-established antidiscrimination laws. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 5:21 am
Judge Rovner, who generally takes a narrower view of Second Amendment protections than does the majority, agreed with the bottom line but wrote separately: To the extent that McDonald v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm
So how do we get tech companies to start fighting surveillance in court, hardening their systems against surveillance, pushing back against the administration, and lobbying for real reform? [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
Data Protection v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
A few weeks ago, for instance, a federal district court judge (Eric Vitaliano of the Eastern District of New York) wrote an opinion rejecting a Social Security ligitant’s request to get an early opinion taken down from the court’s site (see also Eric Goldman’s post on this case): In February 2014, plaintiff Tamara Nelson filed a complaint, seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security… [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
21 May 2022, 3:43 am
X v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
-NAP, one that might appeal to the incoming American administration--by focusing on disclosure, transparency and information sharing. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
The bottom line from the DAO 21(a) Report is that the SEC views ICOs as selling securities. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The Biden administration argues Congress intended the provision as an anti-corruption measure. [read post]
